The screeching feminists waving flags are obvious, it gets tricky though, when the dissonance is entrenched. You get disarming statements acknowledging certain red-pill-ish things, paying service, but then take two steps fwd and see them white-knuckling a go to FI position, or ten steps back, and see how the paying-service pales in comparison to the agenda being pushed.
Their own awareness of such is secondary, I see it, I call it out. Its not about intent either. I think she means well and applaud her work, but it doesn’t make it good or relevant or new or even valuable because it can be painted as a woman crossing the isle.
The evolution of that other blog should be seen as exemplary of how, when pressed, the FI, the agenda, and the trimmings of that power, those free call options, will win out. Even if it means: men back under the bus. I just keep a keen eye out for window dressing but arguably might need to moderate some baby/bathwater tendencies. But then elevating a piece of work because it is from a woman is no different than skewering a piece of work solely because it is from a woman. The ‘hostility’ is not ad hominem, its to the argument, which is not particularly robust nor novel nor actionable.
BV is right, solid thread. So there is that.
239
OffTheCuff says:
May 13, 2014 at 6:43 pm
The joke crossed, Han, nice one.
240
<p><a href="https://american-girls.linkupdate.nl/">The nice guy is unattractive because he’s weak</a></p>
<p><a href="https://american-girls.time2surf.nl/">Are Alphas Happier?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://american-girls.cloudtools.nl/">Bitching Avoids Dating Work</a></p>
<p><a href="https://american-girls.officetime.nl/">Intelligence Boosts Dating Swagger</a></p>
<p><a href="https://american-girls.psas.nl/">You’re Not A People Person</a></p>
<p><a href="https://american-girls.linksnaar.nl/">Creepy Or Loving?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://american-girls.lcvm.nl/">Money Not Needed for Dating</a></p>
<p><a href="https://american-girls.mellaah.nl/">When Too Many Girl Options Is Bad</a></p>